Avidant: A Descriptive-Analytical Tool for Urban Bird Monitoring in the Province of Negros Occidental
Main Article Content
Abstract
Urban bird diversity is a sound environmental indicator of the overall biodiversity. However, despite extensive bird monitoring efforts, there still needs to be more tools for efficiently recording and analyzing bird data. This data is vital for making informed decisions about biodiversity conservation. To address this issue, this study aimed to develop a reliable and user-friendly analytical tool for urban bird monitoring in the Province of Negros Occidental. The descriptive analytics functionality of the device was designed to identify bird species, track changes in bird populations over time, identify areas where bird species are at risk, and prioritize conservation efforts accordingly. The study used the Agile Scrum method and Constructive Research design to develop the mobile application and web system. The system utilizes the Shannon Diversity and Evenness Index and Simpson’s Dominance Index algorithms to analyze bird data. Only identified land bird species found within Negros Occidental were included for urban bird monitoring, excluding sea birds. The study's findings revealed that the system is, indeed, user-friendly, and reliable for gathering data on bird species distribution and abundance in urban areas of Negros Occidental, effectively assisting conservationists in identifying significant bird habitats and assessing the overall state of urban biodiversity. Bacolod City was selected as the pilot location for this study. The study was developed in the School Year 2022-2023.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Ahli, N., and Suratman, R. (2022). The Importance Of City Biodiversity Index (Cbi) Indicators For Malaysia Future Biodiversity Management At Local Level: A Review. Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Environment Management, 7(27), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.35631/jthem.727004.
De Camargo, J. F., Da Silva, F. M., & Smith, W. S. (2021b). City Biodiversity Index and the Cities-Biodiversity Relationship: a Case Study for Sorocaba, SP, Brazil. Urban Ecosystems. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-363556/v1.
Pierce, J. L., et al. (2020). Actions, indicators, and outputs in urban biodiversity plans: A multinational analysis of city practice. PLOS ONE, 15(7), e0235773. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235773.
Yurong, C. Y. A., et al. (2020). Community Structure of Road Associated Avifauna along theUrban Gradient in Mintal, Davao City, Southern Philippines. Biodiversity Journal, 11(3), 771–780. https://doi.org/10.31396/biodiv.jour.2020.11.3.771.780.
Luscier, J. D. (2021). A Core On The Edge: An Urban Bird Assemblage On The Atlantic Margin Of Europe. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-416772/v1.
Fraixedas, S., et al. (2020). A state-of-the-art review on birds as indicators of biodiversity: Advances, challenges, and future directions. Ecological Indicators, 118, 106728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106728.
Yang, X., et al. (2020). The influence of urban park characteristics on bird diversity in Nanjing, China. Avian Research, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-020-00234-5.
Dwivedi, K., et al. (2021). Avifaunal Biodiversity in Chhattisgarh Plain Region of Madhya Pradesh. Science, Technology and Development, 10, 131–146.
Thompson, R., Tamayo, M., & Sigurðsson, S. (2022). Urban bird diversity: does abundance and richness vary unexpectedly with green space attributes? Journal of Urban Ecology, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jue/juac017.
Campbell, C. E., et al. (2022). Big changes in backyard birds: An analysis of long-term changes in bird communities in Australia’s most populous urban regions. Biological Conservation, 272, 109671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109671.
Sidemo‐Holm, W., et al. (2022). Urbanization causes biotic homogenization of woodland bird communities at multiple spatial scales. Global Change Biology, 28(21), 6152–6164. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16350.
Banzon, J. P. M., et al. (2022). Diversity of Bird Species in Urban Green Spaces of Davao City, Mindanao, Philippines. Philippine Journal of Science, 151(5), 1943–1944.
Liang, W., et al. (2020). Insurance for the future? Potential avian community resilience in cities across Europe. Climatic Change, 159(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02583-7.
Ferreira, C. C., et al. (2021). Biodiversity Monitoring and the Role of Scientists in the Twenty-first Century. Wildlife Research Monographs, 25–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81085-6_2.
Mulvaney, J. M., and Cherry, M. I. (2020). The effectiveness of point counts and mist-netting in surveying Afrotemperate forest bird community structure in South Africa. Emu, 120(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/01584197.2020.1726186.
Mesaglio, T., and Callaghan, C. T. (2021). An overview of the history, current contributions, and future outlook of iNaturalist in Australia. Wildlife Research, 48(4), 289. https://doi.org/10.1071/wr20154.
Di Cecco, G. J., et al. (2021). Observing the Observers: How Participants Contribute Data to iNaturalist and Implications for Biodiversity Science. BioScience, 71(11), 1179–1188. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biab093.
Melendez, M., and Panvini, D. (2021). Comparison of Bird Diversity Reported at an eBird Hotspot and Banding Station in an Urban Natural Area Park in Nashville, Tennessee. Journal. Tennessee Academy of Science, 96(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.47226/jtas-d-20-00001.1.
Roger, E., and Motion, A. (2021). Citizen science in cities: an overview of projects focused on urban Australia. Urban Ecosystems, 25(3), 741–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-021-01187-3.
Kühl, H. S., et al. (2020). Effective Biodiversity Monitoring Needs a Culture of Integration. One Earth, 3(4), 462–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.09.010.
Feng, M., and Che-Castaldo, J. (2021). Comparing the reliability of relative bird abundance indices from standardized surveys and community science data at finer resolutions. PLOS ONE, 16(9), e0257226. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257226.
Fink, D., et al. (2020). Modeling avian full annual cycle distribution and population trends with citizen science data. Ecological Applications, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2056.
Callaghan, C. T., et al. (2020). Capitalizing on opportunistic citizen science data to monitor urban biodiversity: A multi-taxa framework. Biological Conservation, 251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108753.